Bond Counsel Letter to MSBA only muddies water more!

Where the new site is not being acquired by the City, we do not think that M.G.L. c, 43, s. 34 requires school committee site approval. However, M.G.L. c.43, s. 34, does require the approval of the school committee of the plans for the new high school project, prior to the commencement of work on the project. Any such plans, of course, would necessarily be site specific, and so any such approval would also constitute site approval.

This just emphasizes the need for a Judge to make this ruling!

How can you say on one hand ” M.G.L. c.43, s. 34, does require the approval of the school committee of the plans for the new high school project, prior to the commencement of work on the project” and “so any such approval would also constitute site approval” but then say “As schematic design and the development of plans have only just gotten underway, we do not see that school committee approval is a legal necessity at this time”?

Here is the letter sent to the MSBA by the Bond Counsel

Advertisements

One thought on “Bond Counsel Letter to MSBA only muddies water more!

  1. Pingback: RichardHowe.com | Lowell Week in Review: August 20, 2017

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s